Not everything comes from children

Posted 16 Sep 2012 — by Jennifer
Category Uncategorized

It is a common misconception about the Reggio Approach that “everything comes from the child.”  Without putting children and teachers on opposite sides of the fence, it is important to consider the role of the adult in the genesis and development of the work. An example:

A school has a shared classroom, where the Yellow Class comes Mondays and Tuesdays, and the Red Class comes Wednesdays and Thursdays. Teachers explained how in  past years, children in one class would inevitably ask questions about the other children’s presence–noticed on mailboxes, cubbies, and documentation in the classroom. “Who are these other children?” they wanted to know.

We talked about how the shared classroom could be a rich area for projects and experiences. (See our notes below):

  • “Capitalizing on the shared space situation a resource:

Children in the past have noticed the presence of other children. How many ways can you find to encourage exchange and relationship building? Message centers, shared projects, adding on to each other’s work, etc. How can you document this “invisible relationship?” Be ready for recording children’s comments and actions connected to recognizing their other classmates, and their desire (we think) to know them.”

After the first week of school, we had our first staff meeting, and talked about “where projects come from.” Were we being too didactic? Not listening to the children enough? Are these ideas only from the adult? A Yellow Class teacher recounted how one child looked up at the cubbies and asked “Who is that?” If we hadn’t discussed the possibility and potential of the relationship between the two classrooms, if we hadn’t had, as Carlina Rinaldi puts it “sensitive antannae,” would the teacher have picked up on that child’s curiosity? Probably not. How teachers proceed, how they think about the process of progettazione around this “invisible relationship” now depends on the reactions and interactions of the children, documented and analyzed by the teachers. We threw a ball around, children caught it, and so now what?

 

 

the implications of exclamations

Posted 08 Sep 2012 — by Jennifer
Category Uncategorized


These were two descriptions written by a teacher on a panel displaying many different kinds of messages children had written to friends in the first week of school. The teacher had carefully selected messages to display in order to highlight their diversity; some had writing, some drawing,  some were beautifully folded and cut.

By the use of the exclamation point in “Anton copied William’s name from the board !” and the lack of one after the statement about the girl who drew her friend, the teacher inadvertently showed a bias for the written language, which she did not intend to do.

Details matter, our choices matter, and we must be conscious and aware of, and deliberate in every choice we make.

Setting Priorities

Posted 31 Aug 2012 — by Jennifer
Category Uncategorized

My husband Todd started in an enviable new position this school year, as Adventure Coordinator at a public charter school. This morning at 4am, we were both awake, trying hard to go back to sleep but unable to quell the storm of things- to-do racing through our minds. Todd and  I talked about all the different directions he is pulled in, all of the things there are to do at the start of a school year in particular. It is important to remember that above all, our list of things-to-do to should reflect being prepared for children as the top priority. So when you are faced with many demands, begin with those that directly influence life in the classroom. Because isn’t ensuring the highest quality of experiences for children the reason why we are educators in the first place?

School supply shopping…

Posted 09 Aug 2012 — by Jennifer
Category Uncategorized

At Community Forklift: http://communityforklift.com/

 

I bought a few things for St. John’s and my sons tried them out this morning…cool!

So now what?

Posted 26 Jul 2012 — by Jennifer
Category Uncategorized

My yoga instructor asked class, “how many of you are here so that you can finally be able to touch your toes?” No one outwardly admitted having this thought, but I knew my intentions were similarly finite: heal so that I can run again.

She asked us, “So now what? Will you stop coming to yoga? You did it; you arrived at your goal, you can touch your toes–is this the end? Where will you go from here?”

I often hear people make similar comments about the Reggio Approach: “I get the Reggio Approach.” “I’m there, I’ve been studying for years.” I think that often those comments are defensive, as if not knowing something or not understanding is a crime. I think about the educators in Reggio, and how consistently and vigorously they analyze and research their own teaching and learning (for the past 50 years). They have not “arrived” at an end point, there is always movement forward, while simultaneously re-examining the past.

[a great quotation from Jimmy Cliff:  "It's always good to revisit the past, to know where we are today."]

So can we go deeper in our understanding of the Approach? Of ourselves? Of our learning and teaching?  Of the processes of thinking? Or are we moving on to something different now that we “get Reggio?” Are we done learning?

So now what?

 

 

 

Critiques

Posted 23 Jul 2012 — by Jennifer
Category observation

Art school staple: the crit.

My fibers teacher, Annette Couwenberg, offered up some questions for us to think about. I will share them here with the hope that they will be useful to extrapolate for other kinds of discussions.

From my notes, October 2, 1997

How do you look at your own, and other’s work?

How to approach it? Analyze it?

First, it is an intuitive feeling.

Environmental/physical level.

Process is a part of it.

How to take it apart?

Look at the difference between size and scale.

Concept of a piece, the idea.

Context of a piece, the environment: what surrounds it? Where is it placed? What idea does it conceptualize? The title can help put it into context.

Formal analysis: Color? Movement? Balance? Size? Shape? Construction? Proportions? Light and shadow? Artist’s hand?

How do you react to the work physically? Emotionally? Intuitively? Intellectually? Formally?

Describe it–what do I see?

What do you think about it? Is it complete, incomplete? Over-complete?

Does it relate to other work, work done before?

Where do you place yourself within the art world?

Personal insights you bring to the work? Insight into my culture, my life?

What does or doesn’t work?

Suggestions for change.

 

 

 

 

Photoshop 101: Buck v. Dragon, lessons learned

Posted 20 Jul 2012 — by Jennifer
Category hundred languages, role of teacher, technology

This week I took an intro to Photoshop class at the Corcoran, and I learned a lot–about the program, about myself as a learner, and about teaching. Here are some reflections:

1. Learning something new is exciting and challenging, uncomfortable and exhausting. For the first time in a long time, I was completely out of my element. I knew how I wanted my final project look, but I couldn’t get it there (buck v. dragon, above, is not the project, I am still working on the assignment)! My project is visually unattractive, sloppy (not intentionally, it’s harder to cut and paste objects skillfully than you might think), awkward and naive.  Many in the group had some visual design experience and I was, of course, comparing. I wanted to hide my screen! A sense of humor really helped me here. I could fortunately laugh at myself, but I had to first accept I was in a state of learning.

2. GROUPS: The dynamics of the group were really interesting–students taking pre-requisites, designers wanting to deepen their knowledge, two 65-70 year old women changing over from film to digital photography. One of these women, we’ll call her Beth, was much slower than the rest of the group, and often got lost and confused. She dropped out on day 3. Those of us sitting next to Beth tried to help her out, but I, for one, got lost myself if I tried to give her support. I could see her patience wane, as well as the patience of the  teacher, and the other students. I felt badly for her, and after Beth left, I became the one with the million questions. I was self-conscious, but I knew that if I didn’t ask, I would never be able to proceed independently. Thinking about a big classroom of 25 children, how often are questions unasked because children are afraid of being the one who doesn’t know? How does a teacher manage such a wide learning discrepancy? This was an intro class-but intro to Mr. Designer and intro to me and Beth is a different story altogether.

3. QUESTIONS: I noticed how precise I had to be in order for the teacher to understand my question. I had to call on my budding Photoshop vocabulary and communication skills to get my point across. I had to rephrase and ask again if the answer was off-base. Is there time for this in classrooms?

4. THE ZONE: On day 3 when the assignment was announced, I began working, and was the only student who could not put something on the page. I tried and tried  for a good 40 minutes to enlarge my image to the canvas size, but it was always blurry. I was unbelievably frustrated, almost to the point of tears. I left 5 minutes early, but before leaving I asked the teacher for assistance and he said to look for higher quality images. I went home, found new images, and came back the next morning–same problem. Luckily Jill,a very nice person sitting next to me, was picking up on my frustration (giveaway: the foul-language spewing from my mouth). Jill watched what I was doing, leaned over and said gently, “press return.”  Hours of agony for a simple return key? So obvious, but not at the time. She said the only reason she could offer advice was because the same thing had happened to her. I think this speaks to observing and documenting, and understanding the processes of learning–if Jill hadn’t watched me work, she would have never picked up on the fact that I wasn’t hitting enter afterwards. And this also speaks to that mysterious zone of proximal development–we have to know each and every child’s (or adult’s) edge, and get to them before they fall off, like Beth.

4. CONTEXT: Many times I had to ask the teacher, “so when would a technique like this be used–for what purpose?” We would have been through the entire lesson on the mechanics of, say, creating a path, without me knowing why there would be a need to create a path in the first place. So the knowledge becomes useless its application can’t be imagined.  A good example of context and instruction is found in The Ashley Book of Knots. Ashley tells you how to make a knot, but first explains what kinds of situations would require that knot, for example: “The axle hitch may be used for emergency towing.” He gives you the history and background of groups of knots, and these stories help to remember the function and purpose of the knot. How often do we give information without context? This has parallels with the Theory of the Hundred Languages in that learning mechanics and techniques and are necessary to build an alphabet–a vocabulary of a language. A language, though, is (among other things) an expression of those techniques; the story, not the letters. If materials and techniques are separate from experience, from context, the relevance of action is diminished.

5. PROBLEM-FINDING: Learning is about “problem-finding” (to borrow a word from my good friends Jennifer Kesserling and Kacey Davenport from Riverfield School in Tulsa, OK). With every design decision I made, I had new problems to find. These problems make the work interesting, but also very demanding. Without the proper support I would have been stuck. Sometimes after exhausting my own knowledge base, I needed a small key to unlock a new world. That key could come from the teacher, other students, or on-line tutorials and information. When a child hits a road block, how many ways does he know to go around? Sources of information are unique to the scenario-what works in one instance doesn’t work in all.

6. MANNERS: I was shocked at the behavior of many of the students. They checked Facebook or email at every spare moment-and then some. Even while the teacher was explaining something! They could not attend to the teacher for longer than a few minutes. This climate is pervasive in our culture, and it needs to be turned around. Call me old-fashioned, but manners, courtesy, and grace should be part of every school’s–every family’s–values.

7. CRITIQUE:  I shared my final project at the group critique. Even though my project was one of the least accomplished, I did not feel anxious about receiving their thoughts. The students had good comments and phrased feedback in beautiful ways, many asking questions: “Did you think about doing _______? ” “What about if you tried ________?” Some gave suggestions: “You might want to try the sponge tool there.” Knowing how to give feedback is crucial to having an honest dialogue, and I will take a page from the students’ book.

In my next post I will share the protocol for a group critique used in my fiber class at MICA.

Rope splicing and other summer fun

Posted 02 Jul 2012 — by Jennifer
Category Uncategorized

For a Christmas present, we bought Louis the rope-splicing tools he needed desperately. The tools remained packaged until just last week, when in the doldrums of a DC summer they were rediscovered. Louis is truly talented at knot tying, however splicing is a whole other ballgame–it took a couple of hours for him to splice successfully. He couldn’t do this during the school year because he didn’t have the time or the mental space to figure out the process. I  find it really interesting what we can do when we have some down-time: splice rope, learn a new software program (I am finally taking a Photoshop class this summer), mosaic a wall, or create stink bombs from household materials. These activities aren’t so mind-blowing, but they involve new problems to solve, new questions to ask, and I can just feel those neurons being created.

The Crossley ID Guide: Eastern Birds

Posted 22 May 2012 — by Jennifer
Category Uncategorized

Amazon.com: The Crossley ID Guide: Eastern Birds 9780691147789: Richard Crossley: Books.

Listen to Crossley explain the process and reasoning behind his innovative book on bird identification. The graphic design communicates so much information on one page, and it is a refreshing take on that dinosaur, the field guide (of which, I should add, I am a huge fan).

Lessons from roses

Posted 08 May 2012 — by Jennifer
Category Uncategorized

 

Lesson #1: Love

I went out to the front of a school today to pick some roses as models for drawing. Walking back into the classroom, people were sort of…shocked. “You mean you just ran out to the front and cut those flowers?” “You have a lot of energy.”  A teacher commented that I was a little crazy (not in a negative way). I told her, “you haven’t seen the half of it,” and thus began our discussion of the lack of love and fun in school.

It is a very difficult thing to talk about love and beauty and caring in a school system that is struggling to keep its head above water. Recent statistics point to unconscionable levels of illiteracy. Yet without nurturing a culture of empathy, respect and beauty, I don’t foresee test scores rising. If children don’t learn to care–about their environment, their friends, their work–we will remain mired in a cycle of ignorance and mediocrity.

Lesson #2:Details matter

Amelia Gambetti’s (an educator from Reggio Emilia who I worked with for many years) voice still rings in my ear: “Details, details, details.”  It is important to be aware of the choices that we make, from the most minor decisions to the most significant. Drawing the roses, there were two types of markers available, fine line and broad tip. We spent time talking about the differences in the lines, and I asked children to consider which marker they needed, instead of grabbing haphazardly. Attentive decision making, discerning, selecting, choosing, builds self-awareness and consciousness–the opposite of indifference.